Talk:Zheng Shuang (actress, born 1991)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. —innotata 18:53, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

---

Zheng Shuang (born 1991) → Zheng Shuang – The other actress has no page. Timmyshin (talk) 09:00, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

• Support: The other topic listed on the DAB page is (currently) entirely unsourced and not linked to any article. If that situation changes, this article should not be moved, but in the current situation there is no need for disambiguation. —BarrelProof (talk) 18:26, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
• Oppose - User:BarrelProof unfortunately in this case, as too often because of our giant WP:RECENT bias, a redlink on a China name dabpage in en.wp indicates that there is a person 10x more notable on zh.wp and in English books. Zheng Shuang is a common name, and the two subjects in books are the older actress zh:郑爽 (1966年生), and Zheng Shuang (artist). User:Timmyshin, would you be willing to start a stub on the older actress? This one should move to Zheng Shuang (actress, born 1991) since the woodcut artist (b.1936) is more notable in English books. In ictu oculi (talk) 00:17, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

• No, I don't know who the old actress is, and the young actress should be primary over the artist IMO. Timmyshin (talk) 00:52, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Why? When she's not mentioned in books and the artist is, how does the new actress pass WP:PRIMARYTOPIC? Primary Topic is the exception on en.wp, we only knowingly give articles ambiguous titles when we're 100% convinced that the subject is more likely than all other uses of the name in history combined. So how is the new actress more significant than all other Zheng Shuangs who have ever lived taken together? Please see WP:PRIMARYTOPIC and WP:RECENT. I've created Zheng Shuang (actress, born 1966). In ictu oculi (talk) 02:27, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

• Where in WP:PRIMARYTOPIC says that you must appear in books? "A topic is primary for a term, with respect to usage, if it is highly likely—much more likely than any other topic, and more likely than all the other topics combined—to be the topic sought when a reader searches for that term." Is this even a debate that the younger actress, whose page gets thousands of hits per month, is multiple times more likely to be the sought-after topic, even if you consider the artist? Timmyshin (talk) 09:01, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

As previously, here:

WP:AT Usage in English reliable sources demonstrated with Google web, news, scholar, or book searches )

In ictu oculi (talk) 03:43, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

• So "Google web, news, scholar or book searches" is equivalent to "Google book searches"? Timmyshin (talk) 10:09, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

• Removed support above by strikethrough above, as the situation has changed. Oppose proposed move under the new circumstances, and I suggest withdrawal of the proposal. —BarrelProof (talk) 19:07, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

• Oppose per In ictu oculi, as well as support the alternate page move. However, this page should actually be moved to Zheng Shuang (actress, born 1991) in order to include the necessary comma per WP:NCPDAB. Steel1943 (talk) 04:29, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Zheng Shuang (actress, born 1991). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120102132428/http://therainhouse.wordpress.com:80/2010/08/21/zhengshuangandwuchuninromanceofthewestchamber/ to http://therainhouse.wordpress.com/2010/08/21/zhengshuangandwuchuninromanceofthewestchamber/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:54, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

The Secret Keepers controversy

The postponement was due to a general blacklist by the state regulators on a co-actor, Zhao Lixin and that the production team had to edit Zhao out from the drama. WANG XIAOLING995 04:29, 17 April 2021 (UTC)