Talk:Zhangjiajie National Forest Park

Height of Southern Sky Column

The height figure of 1080m/3540ft, which appears by now to have been referenced in hundreds of articles elsewhere online, was first added (3544ft claimed at the time) in this revision, and was/is not supported by the article cited (archived here) for the sentence in which it appears. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.47.81.86 (talk) 18:47, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Glass bridge

User:Jax 0677: I think the glass bridge should have an article. Are you interested in starting it please? good idea! It's quite something.Zigzig20s (talk) 05:05, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

• Reply - @Zigzig20s:, be bold! --Jax 0677 (talk) 16:47, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Zhangjiajie National Forest Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110606043905/http://www2.chinadaily.com.cn/life/2010-01/26/content_9375209.htm to http://www2.chinadaily.com.cn/life/2010-01/26/content_9375209.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091228085058/http://life.globaltimes.cn/entertainment/2009-12/494242_2.html to http://life.globaltimes.cn/entertainment/2009-12/494242_2.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:31, 5 December 2017 (UTC)