| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Zhang Guotao article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled
editIs this a piece of Chinese Communist propaganda?
It certainly takes what appears to be the official Party line, and that alone. I may try to edit if I can dig out some other sources I vaguely recall.Kumarajiva 08:53, 22 June 2007 (UTC)Kumarajiva
The military leadership section is very poorly worded and extremely biased against the subject. Someone please edit that section to be more objective. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.194.18.65 (talk) 04:22, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
The article was very biased and read like Communist Party propaganda. I have edited it to make it more balanced based on an article in the Toronto Star, which is in turn based on the book Mao: The Unknown Story by Chang/Halliday. The article still needs significant improvement and more varied citations. Zatoichi26 (talk) 18:05, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
No comrade, Manifest Destiny is propaganda. American Dream is propaganda. This is Chinese history. 99.32.59.9 (talk) 19:08, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
"The article was very biased and read like Communist Party propaganda. I have edited it to make it more balanced based on an article in the Toronto Star, which is in turn based on the book Mao: The Unknown Story by Chang/Halliday." - Actually that book was proven shortly after its publication to be unreliable, full of falsifications, and amounting to anti-communist propaganda. It should not be referenced for factual information.
Assessment comment
editThe comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Zhang Guotao/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
| The military leadership section is poorly worded and extremely biased against the subject. Someone please edit this section to be more objective. |
Last edited at 04:21, 14 September 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 11:16, 30 April 2016 (UTC)