| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
"She is also rather annoying" edit
I agree with the sentiment but it is opinion, not fact. Hence I have removed the offending paragraph. 83.104.249.240 (talk) 09:56, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
Very annoying and not even decent wank fodder. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.39.156.98 (talk) 15:30, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
"How the hell does she get all this work?" edit
Serious question actually - she is of no immediately apparent talent but has a considerable number of jobs in a variety of spheres under her belt - so how did she get this work? What got her foot in the door? She studied at Oxford yet toured as a backup dancer? How were no actual dancers available at the time? I'm basically wondering if she's someone important's daughter... anyone know a potted biography? --Fleeelf (talk) 22:19, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
Also, I'm seeing reports that she didn't compelte her degree, leaving after only a year. Can anyone confirm? 131.111.200.200 (talk) 15:04, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
"Zizi [sic] adopts a zany and quirky style" edit
This is also a matter of opinion. The words "viewing figures can suggest" are weasel words. Either they suggest or they don't. If Ifore's zany presentation style has indeed resulted in a decline in viewing figures for the show then this should be re-worded and a citation provided. Otherwise the sentence will be deleted. 83.104.249.240 (talk) 20:10, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
Really? edit
I find it amusing that someone bothered to write this. She is a terrible presenter and I hope that whoever it was at E4 that thought she was up to the job, is now standing on the rooftop edge ready to jump! Possibly also the person at Universal who maybe suggested that she should take the e4Music job. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.229.234.60 (talk) 13:32, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
It's an encyclopedia. She may be terrible, but she is notable, at least until her spell as BBLB presenter ends. A Sheep (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 10:06, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
Vandalism edit
It'd be good if people could remember that Wikipedia isn't a forum. I may agree with your opinions, but this isn't the place to air them. Quit vandalising the page. Nicpowel (talk) 12:39, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
Reverted edit
I've reverted quite a lot of changes, as there was a long section which was very questionably worded, and was irrelevant anyway seeing as there's a "Complaints" section. 17:37, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
Where has the "Criticism" section gone? edit
She was widely criticised during the last series of Big Brother, but that section has been removed? Why?
- This section has been removed because it's not warranted, these sources are all opinion blogs which fail WP:RS, the information is from tabloid blogs, and there's no need to give WP:UNDUE weight to these opinions by having a section on it which affects the WP:NPOV of the article. A line has been left in on her take on it. Roomiebroom (talk) 21:10, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
IPA edit
I'm basing the pronunciation on someone mishearing her name as "daisy eyeful". But we should be able to do better. kwami (talk) 00:35, 30 June 2009 (UTC)