A fact from Zero stroke appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 19 January 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
"A mental disorder [...] characterized by the patient's desire to write endless rows of zeroes". LOL. I should probably agree that it's poorly sourced, since checking all the sources I can access, only reveals two very dubious 'articles', but it's pretty well written - better than many articles that are more believably sourced. I cannot resist the temptation to just let it be. Andreas Willow (talk) 09:37, 19 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
It was discussed at the DYK suggestions page here. The author said that while he also doubted the veracity of the "disorder", he was unable to find any reference that clearly debunked it. Ucucha12:57, 19 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
One might argue that a criterion for putting things on Wikipedia is that those things are properly sourced, instead of hard-to-debunk. I'd say the evidence is pretty thin in this case, but I don't have the cited books at hand so I have no idea whether they contain strong evidence. Andreas Willow (talk) 12:29, 22 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
I looked a little better and to my own surprise came across a pretty believeable reference. Apparently this page here (search for 'cipher') suggests that there was an article in the December 1923 New York Times that mentioned 'Cipher Stroke'. So it seems to be indeed the case that at least popular news media mentioned it at the time. Fascinating. Pity I cannot read the actual article... Andreas Willow (talk) 12:44, 22 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
I am the editor that put this article together. While I do think that this may have been a condition hyped by the media and possibly did not really exist (except for a complusion by a few individuals), it does appear that the popular media reported on its existence and therefore I have tried to gather all that is known about it. Any help to make this article better is appreciated. Remember (talk) 13:57, 22 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
True that – google reveals not a single German translation of this "zero stroke", neither does any German translation site. This "story" exists only in English, it seems. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.159.196.147 (talk) 23:43, 22 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
I was wondering the same thing as a professional translator. A "stroke" is a "Schlaganfall", but it's not something you could combine with "Null" (the German word for "zero"). In other words, I can't think of a single German construction that could result in this English translation "zero stroke". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.132.232.238 (talk) 19:46, 25 February 2019 (UTC)Reply