Talk:Zebras (Law & Order: Special Victims Unit)/GA1

Latest comment: 12 years ago by MathewTownsend in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MathewTownsend (talk · contribs) 02:01, 22 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Looks interesting, but I already found some link rot. Will review shortly. MathewTownsend (talk) 02:01, 22 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Link rot fixed. --Davejohnsan (talk) 21:49, 22 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

GA review-see WP:WIAGA for criteria (and here for what they are not)

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose: clear and concise, respects copyright laws, correct spelling and grammar: 
    B. Complies with manual of style guidelines for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. Provides references to all sources according to the guide for layout:  
    B. Provides in-line citations from reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Main aspects are addressed:  
    B. Focused: (See summary style):  
  4. Does it follow the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail: