Talk:Zdeněk P. Bažant
Latest comment: 7 years ago by 84.209.65.99 in topic The Bazant report
Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Zdeněk P. Bažant article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page appears to be the equivalent of a CV - it is not an encyclopedic entry. This page requires clean-up and citation to facts! --Ernstk (talk) 00:32, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
- As an example, the article states "Bažant was the winner of the 1955 Mathematical Olympics", but the article International Mathematical Olympiad states "The first IMO was held in Romania in 1959". Coyets (talk) 12:37, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
- What about the 2008 Timoshenko medal? --132.64.82.53 (talk) 15:05, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
Discussion by 84.215.37.78 on 28 October 2015
editHow about mentioning the 911 report too? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.215.37.78 (talk) 11:30, 28 October 2010
- This article is designed to prop Bazant up, is poorly cited and referenced, and is full of conjecture regarding what he has 'proven'. Bazant's writings on 911 are probably the single most significant thing he has ever done, yet they are conspicuously absent. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.26.221.131 (talk) 17:32, 26 July 2015
The Bazant report
editNot a single WORD about his report and defense of the NIST explanation of the WTC collapses on 9/11 2001 ??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.209.65.99 (talk) 09:43, 21 June 2017 (UTC)