Talk:Zarya (ISS module)

Untitled

does any one noe all of the 107 people that have been to the iss —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.227.125.130 (talk • contribs) 16:39, 9 June 2006

Check the various Space Station Mission lists. Athough a list that long wouldn't belong in this article. Jon 13:12, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

part of NASA's plan for the International Space Station

Is it just me or is the wording on every single ISS related article implying that NASA is behind the ISS? As far as I know this is an international effort which NASA could not even start before Canada, Japan, Russia and Europe were involved for funding and expertise purposes. The core modules and the Space Station idea are both Russian as well so where is this NASA centrism coming from? Please, for gods sake, this is the first human international effort at space research and travel. KEEP IT NEUTRAL. Jenga3 (talk) 09:18, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have just modified one external link on Zarya. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071009193814/http://space.kursknet.ru/cosmos/english/cargoes/pr1m4.sht to http://space.kursknet.ru/cosmos/english/cargoes/pr1m4.sht

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:46, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have just modified one external link on Zarya. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/5ilAO9cCm?url=http://www.astronautix.com/craft/proessm1.htm to http://www.astronautix.com/craft/proessm1.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:14, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Requested move 28 April 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: all moved. (non-admin closure) NW1223<Howl at me•My hunts> 21:02, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

---

• Zarya → Zarya (ISS module)
• Zarya (spacecraft) → Zarya (space capsule)
• Zarya (disambiguation) → Zarya

– There is no primary topic for this word. Pageviews show that this page and the Overwatch character get nearly equal pageviews on average. Either way, Zarya (spacecraft) is too vague for the article it is used on and should redirect to the disambiguation. Forgive me if I am wrong about the proper disambiguations as there are very few examples of two conflicting spacecraft; I am open to alternate suggestions. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 17:53, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

• Support per nomination. There are 13 entries listed upon the Zarya (disambiguation) page, with no indication that the scientific and historical positioning of the ISS module is at such an elevated level in the English-speaking world that it overtakes the combined renown of the 12 remaining entries. As for Zarya (spacecraft) → Zarya (space capsule), the proposed form is more specific, while consisting of only two additional letters plus a space. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 15:46, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
• Support  Solid argument. —Michael Z. 16:03, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
• Support Zarya (Overwatch) gets more views (2,362) than the ISS module (2,170) though the ISS module probably has more long-term significance than the Overwatch character and the ISS module is also a spacecraft so the 2nd title is ambiguous. Crouch, Swale (talk) 09:43, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

  @Crouch, Swale: Zarya (Soviet spacecraft) or Zarya (cancelled spacecraft) are probably the next best picks since I suppose technically the module can also be considered a space capsule. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 16:20, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

  I don't have much of an oppinion on what the qualified title is for the 2nd move just that the current one is ambiguous. Crouch, Swale (talk) 16:29, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

• Support all per nom, including retargeting the potentially ambiguous Zarya (spacecraft) to the disambiguation page. Steel1943 (talk) 18:25, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.