Talk:Zaoyuan station (Beijing Subway)
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Ymblanter in topic Infobox Image
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Infobox Image
editThe image in the infobox should present the up-to-date formal qualities of the station structure. Thus, the File:Platform of Zaoyuan Station (20201202141147).jpg is more suitable than the existing file. "Whenever images are included in Wikipedia, it makes a big difference if they look good"; "Use the best quality images available. Poor-quality images—dark or blurry; showing the subject too small, hidden in clutter, or ambiguous; and so on—should not be used unless absolutely necessary." MNXANL (talk) 03:43, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- The station has not changed, judging from both photos, and thus both represent the actual state of the station. On my screen, my photo looks fine, and another one looks slighly overexposed. I am also generally not happy with a massive replacement of my photos in all articles on Beijing subway. I spent quite a lot of my time travelling around all the stattions and taking photos while nobody else cared, and I am not happy to hear that my photos are such trasdh that they must be continuously removed without discussion. More of the half of my photos have already been replaced--Ymblanter (talk) 09:11, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- I appreciate your effort. But please keep in mind that you don't need to be so defensive on your photos taken almost 10 years ago, a lot had been changed. Images at some Hong Kong MTR station pages could even be entirely replaced on a monthly basis. MNXANL (talk) 15:35, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- This is not Hong Kong, this is Beijing, and I do not see any difference between the layouts of the station on two photos. I am not defensive about every photo of mine, some were indeed replaced by better versions, and some were outdated, and I have never complained. But I do not see why everything I have made must be blanket replaced.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- For the public good (the readers in this scenario), having good quality images would always be better regardless of who took those pictures. MNXANL (talk) 19:57, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, however, I do not see why this image is better than mine. On my screen, it looks overexposed, and mine looks ok.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:32, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- For the public good (the readers in this scenario), having good quality images would always be better regardless of who took those pictures. MNXANL (talk) 19:57, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- This is not Hong Kong, this is Beijing, and I do not see any difference between the layouts of the station on two photos. I am not defensive about every photo of mine, some were indeed replaced by better versions, and some were outdated, and I have never complained. But I do not see why everything I have made must be blanket replaced.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- I appreciate your effort. But please keep in mind that you don't need to be so defensive on your photos taken almost 10 years ago, a lot had been changed. Images at some Hong Kong MTR station pages could even be entirely replaced on a monthly basis. MNXANL (talk) 15:35, 21 February 2021 (UTC)