Talk:Zalgo text

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 174.160.30.123 in topic Usability
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 4, 2021Guild of Copy EditorsCopyedited
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on April 17, 2021.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the Lovecraftian Zalgo text (pictured) is a common aspect of "surreal memes"?

Did you know nomination

edit
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk22:27, 15 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

 
Zalgo text

Created by Vaticidalprophet (talk). Self-nominated at 16:06, 13 March 2021 (UTC).Reply

  •   I've read the article and I think it's okay. But could you maybe find a better source than this one for the description of Zalgo text as "Lovecraftian"? (I'm asking myself whether the source is sufficient...) --Moscow Connection (talk) 18:26, 13 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • @Vaticidalprophet: I think I can tick this one anyway but there is another small problem. It seems to me that the opening sentence of the article is somewhat unclear. It can be understood as that Zalgo text is made by "combining several letters". It should be made clear that there are so-called combining characters which are intended to combine with the letter that comes immediately before them and that is how Zalgo text is made. My attempt at clarification is even more unclear than your original version, but I hope you will be able to come up with something better. (I will be out of Wikipedia until Monday or Tuesday, but I will come back and tick this nomination.) --Moscow Connection (talk) 18:57, 13 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

StackOverflow regex parsing of HTML

edit

You'd need a reference for it, but I'd be surprised if this weren't relevant to the development and uptake of Zalgo text. At the moment the history rather jumps from 2004 to 2020. › Mortee talk 03:53, 17 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Zalgo text direct example

edit

Since an IP editor added an actual string of Zalgo text to the article with this edit, I'm wondering if it's worthwhile keeping it. It probably violates MOS:NOSYMBOLS for accessibility reasons / potentially breaking the site. I don't think having just images of Zalgo text is a perfect replacement either, since it's the encoding of the text itself that's important. I feel silly, but I'm wondering if this is a rare case for WP:IAR. —Wingedserif (talk) 02:33, 14 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

That's an interesting thought. I value both IAR and accessibility as highest virtues. What I'd lean towards here is having an actual screen reader user check out the article and see if it breaks it. Vaticidalprophet 03:29, 14 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
Z̴̲̬͋̑̒̽a̴̗̩͛͂̀l̷̛̳̯̈́́́ͅg̶͍̥̅̾̇̀ȯ̷̡̭̉̇ ̶̨̰̲̳̈́̆t̴̪͎͔̘̑e̷̲͒x̷͙͎̻̘̋͒́ṯ̷̒̋̊
Could do something like this (see infobox). Elli (talk | contribs) 03:35, 14 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Vaticidalprophet: As a screen reader user, I've gotten here through this village pump thread I started thanks to finding what turns out to be a completely ridiculous example of the phenomenon. I have no problem whatsoever with short examples like the one in the article and on the talk page. Also, Vaticidalprophet, I hope you don't mind what I did to the page history. Graham87 16:50, 10 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Usability

edit

This articles does not mention that Zalgo is a "Fuck you!" to the blind. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.160.30.123 (talk) 16:19, 26 February 2023 (UTC)Reply