Talk:Zalambur

Mythology Low‑importance

	Mythology portal This article is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Islam

	Islam portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 8 October 2017 edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: No consensus after relisting, minimal participation — Andy W. (talk) 13:06, 24 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Zalambur → Five Sons of Iblis – Before we make an article for each of these five sons, wouldn't be better to rename this article and include these five sons in this article? (originally requested by VenusFeuerFalle) Daylen (talk) 23:21, 8 October 2017 (UTC) --Relisting. DrStrauss talk 19:31, 16 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

For such an early stage article, no need for a formal RM - just move it yourself, but only if you add in descriptions of the other 4 sons. SnowFire (talk) 02:39, 18 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Oppose. Write the other articles first, and then we'll see. Are the others even notable? — Amakuru (talk) 21:58, 23 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Add topic