Talk:Zail Singh/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sarangem (talk · contribs) 12:06, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	Properly follows layout.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	Try to cite references in a template, not manually. Sorry, I didn't get the issue here. I think all sources cited as per the layout style guideline. Ashwin147 (talk) 10:15, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	It would be better if 10th citation is not formatted in PDF. The data is available as PDF. There's no bar on citing pdf links. Ashwin147 (talk) 10:15, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
	2c. it contains no original research.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.	No plagiarism as of Earwig's detector
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	In section Union Minister of Home Affairs (1980–82), Bhindranwale's release is properly mentioned (that should be summarised properly in lead section's 4th paragraph.) Have expanded the lede to mention the rivalry with Darbara Singh preventing action against the insurgents. The specific incident might be too much detail for an introduction, no? Ashwin147 (talk) 10:15, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.	Congrats on being GA. Make sure it follows the GA Criterias afterwards.