Talk:Yvonne Latty
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Yvonne Latty article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Deletion?
editThe article has existed for 11 months, and is suddenly being proposed for deletion. This does not make sense, not does the reason for the proposal: "threats". I see no threats in the article. Everything in it seems to be public knowledge, with nothing that would violate WP:BLP. What is the problem? 71.234.215.133 (talk) 05:18, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
- The reason given is "threats". This is not very specific and besides it is not a reason to delete the whole article if the subject is notable. Any threats should be removed leaving the rest of the article. I am going to remove the tag and also remove any content that seems threatening or defamatory. If anybody thinks that the article should be deleted for other reasons then I recommend an AfD so it can be discussed properly. --DanielRigal (talk) 22:31, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
- OK. Done. No threats or defamation found at all. In fact, it is quite friendly in tone. Perhaps the person who put it up for deletion can explain what they think the problem is? Maybe there were threats here in the past? --DanielRigal (talk) 22:38, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Yvonne Latty. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080830133401/http://blogs.usatoday.com:80/oped/2006/11/another_wwii_fi.html to http://blogs.usatoday.com/oped/2006/11/another_wwii_fi.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:02, 26 January 2016 (UTC)