This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Youngberg v. Romeo is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability articles
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Bringing up his IQ feels irrelevant. He had an intellectual disability, and I think it's fine to say he couldn't care for himself, was non-verbal, etc., but 1. IQ is controversial, 2. We don't know under what circumstances the IQ test was administered and whether he scored so low due to stress or other mitigating circumstances. It lacks context.
Article needs more info about the abuse in general. Waitalie Nat (talk) 01:40, 21 April 2018 (UTC)Reply
