Talk:Young Independence

Too juch trivial information

There is absolutely no need to list every petty office holder within the junior ranks of any political party. We don't even do it for the main parties, let alone their youth sections. Wikipedia is not a directory; we do not include information simply because it exists. I conced that national chairmen may be OK (and note that the subhead says "former" but includes the incumbent): the rest is superfluous. Emeraude (talk) 14:55, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

is this organisation legal? Can you discriminate against people over 30 for joining such things?

Obviously...otherwise no party would have a youth wing lmao92.6.56.143 (talk) 21:11, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

Merger proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was consent is presumed due to a general lack of interest or attention to this article. Theprussian (talk) 17:24, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

---

I propose to merge Young Independence into UKIP. There's not really enough information/notability about Young Independence to justify having a separate article. With UKIP in major decline, this article is showing it's age and is not really being kept up to date because there isn't really any new news about Young Independence. It's better if the smaller aspects of UKIP are kept in the main UKIP article. Theprussian (talk) 15:45, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

• Comment unless there is strong objection/discord within the next 7 days, this article will be merged with UKIP and be turned in to a re-direct.Theprussian (talk) 15:57, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.