Talk:Young Hyacinth

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Young Hyacinth article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

BBC: Sitcoms High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by BBC Sitcoms Task Force.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

Television: British / Episode coverage

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British television task force.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Comedy High‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

edit count | edit summary usage

It seems awfully silly to be presenting this as a "series" of one episode. Shouldn't it just be called a special? Number of episodes: one? Seriously? 24.188.49.191 (talk) 23:45, 24 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Sourcing for categories edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

There is no support in the article, nor a WP:RS, to support a category such as "Narcisissm" here, or in the article for the original series. Per WP:CATV, this is required for categories. I have removed it, without prejudice to re-adding it with a reliable source and documentation inside the article. 70.162.235.236 (talk) 23:58, 14 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

A cursory viewing of any episode of Keeping Up Appearances would justify many of the categories you have deleted. Paul Benjamin Austin (talk) 00:23, 15 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

That is WP:OR. 70.162.235.236 (talk) 00:32, 15 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

No, it's primary source not OR. Are you a sock of a certain banned user? Paul Benjamin Austin (talk) 01:18, 15 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Add topic