Talk:Young Conservatives of Texas
 | The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
 | It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in Texas may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
 | This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Logo size
editDoes anybody have any objection to removing the forced upsizing of the logo? It's blurry and doesn't really need to be that big to be readable. Pending a 48 hour objection period I indend to remove the upsize parameter. Hasteur (talk) 03:01, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
Copyright problem removed
editPrior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://sfayct.org/about/ and The Conservative Revolution: How to Win the Battle for College Campuses, page 139. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 17:46, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
Despite being nominated for deletion at AFD (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Young Conservatives of Texas), this article still does not have a single notability reference. It CLEARLY fails WP:ORG and WP:GNG in its current state. Monty845 20:44, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
- If there are sufficient sources out there then it passes the notability requirements even if the sources aren't in the article. It just makes it a shoddy article at the moment. VernoWhitney (talk) 20:53, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
Eyewitness account: in 1980 I was a hippie objectivist apprehensive about soviet H-bombs and energy shortages and subscribed to YAF before realizing it was a religious hate group. I remember Steve Munisteri vaguely, and attended meetings but was the only person there in sandals and shoulder-length hair (while not female). I thought they changed names to YCT to get rid of hippie objectivist infiltrators and had no clue of any disagreement with HQ. That same year I discovered the LP and have been a happy camper since. According to one young tool in the YAF newsletter mail section, to be conservative you had to want men with guns to ban abortion. I can produce a letter about nuclear energy, but do not have the old newsletters to offer as proof. translator (talk) 18:29, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
COI/paid editors on this article
edit@Viewmont Viking and Peaceray: the list of officers added recently strongly suggests that the two new editors are among them. I've posted to both their talk pages. Of course they are unlikely to have known our views on this sort of thing. Doug Weller talk 12:05, 6 April 2022 (UTC)