Talk:You Know My Name/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: –– Jezhotwells (talk) 13:26, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   I made some minor copy-edits[1].

   There is a final stray, uncited sentence: In 2008, the Finnish rock band Poets of the Fall covered the song in a Studio Live CD that played in the match between Manchester United and Inter Milan. Doesn't seem notable and is not clear. Would be best to remove this.

   Reworked, but if you feel unnnecessary, I'll remove.

   I am a little confused about Cornell and Arnold playing all the instruments except the drums and then references to an orchestral version. Can this be clarified?

   Removed. Didn't make much sense either.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   There are un-addressed dead links. Billboard is not archived at the Internet Archive, so you will need to hunt for replacement links. they may be somewhere on the Billboard site, I have come across this before.

   Done with Google Books, and a Billboard.biz (registration required, but works) replacements.

   ref #5 [2] has been tagged as an unreliable source. If you attribute the interview with a phrase such as: "Speaking to film music fan site Maintitles, Arnold said ..." that should be OK

   Done.

   The quote from Cinefantastique [3], has a typo (it is there in the source) which looks clumsy. the best Bond theme song in years, one the captures the full-blooded glory of classics like 'Goldfinger'" suggest change to the best Bond theme song in years, [that] captures the full-blooded glory of classics like 'Goldfinger'" to eliminate this.

   Done.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   On hold for seven days for the above issues to be addressed. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 14:05, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

   Anything else needed? igordebraga ≠ 20:02, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

   Everything is fine now. I am happy to list this as a Good Article. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 20:30, 5 April 2010 (UTC)