This article was nominated for deletion on 19 April 2024. The result of the discussion was keep. |
You Are in Love is currently a Songs good article nominee. Nominated by Brachy08 (Talk) at 04:36, 13 April 2024 (UTC) An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria. Further reviews are welcome from any editor who has not contributed significantly to this article (or nominated it), and can be added to the review page, but the decision whether or not to list the article as a good article should be left to the first reviewer. Short description: 2015 promotional single by Taylor Swift |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Demonstrating notability edit
Hey Brachy0008, skimming through the references in this draft, I'm hesitant to accept it due to the highly scattered coverage. I'm not seeing discussion of the subject in any individual sources beyond a couple of sentences, which is not significant coverage. Could you list the three sources that best demonstrate the subject's notability? —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 23:33, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- 9, 10 and 22 are the best sources I could find. Brachy08 (Talk) 03:08, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks; I'm still a little on the fence about it, but I'll accept it based on the amount of encyclopedic content you've managed to extract from other sources. I'll leave the article in the new pages feed, so you should hopefully be getting a second opinion from another reviewer soon. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 04:05, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- By the way, citation 2 is currently a shortened footnote that does not point to a full citation. You might want to take a look at that! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 04:13, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
GA Review edit
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:You Are in Love/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Brachy0008 (talk · contribs) 04:36, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Pollosito (talk · contribs) 17:16, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
- a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Hey, @Brachy08! I will be reviewing this article in a few days. What worries me about this process is the shortness of the article, but I will try to save it, I think it is worth it. Best, Santi (talk) 17:16, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Background and writing edit
- Can you put an additional source to verify the Red's release date?
- Replace parameter "p" with "pp" in ref 2, 'cause it doesn't work.
- It's page 78, not 77. See Clean (song), which has the same info.
- For "after her birth year", use this. Refs 5 and 6 don't mention that.
- Verify that at that time she was on the Red Tour. I know you put it the way it is out of logic, but maybe don't do that.
- Ref 7 needs to be archieved.
- Link American Songwriter in ref 9. Furthermore, change template to "cite magazine" and archive it.
- Authorship and archiving missing in ref 8.
Lyrics and composition edit
- Authorship for ref 13, 15, 16 and 18.
- Archiving for ref 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 18.
- Change template to "cite magazine" for ref 11, 13, 15 and 18.
- Change template to "cite news" to ref 12.
- Delete authorship for ref 11 and change "Clash Magazine Music News, Reviews & Interviews" to "[[Clash (magazine)|Clash]]"
- Just leave "David Greenwald" in authorship, delete the rest. Replace "oregonlive" to "[[The Oregonian]]
- Link the websites/magazines/news in all the sources.
- Fuse ref 15 and 17, they are the same.
- "Swift also said that she wrote it as a commentary of Swift and Dunham's relationship." Wasn't it Antonoff?.
- "Swift says she finds it difficult and boring at times. The song also describes love and something that can be felt, seen or heard." I don't understand it.
Comments edit
- Hey, @Brachy0008! I'm close to resuming the review. Before I can begin, I would like to know if the research paper is complete, to make the review a little easier due to the recent AfD nomination. Thank you. Santi (talk) 02:30, 1 May 2024 (UTC)