Talk:You All Over Me/GA1

GA Review

Reviewer: VersaceSpace (talk · contribs) 16:51, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

lead and infobox

• "describes the narrators inability" → "describes the narrator's inability"
  • Done.
    • Actually done. (I somehow forgot to save the edits, sorry about that)
• The song debuted atop Billboard Country Digital Songs and Country Streaming Songs charts" → "The song debuted atop the Billboard Country Digital Songs and Country Streaming Songs charts"
  • Done.
• The lyric video has more than 6.8 million views now
  • Updated to 7 million views.
• infobox looks good

background and release

• some context should be given regarding the masters situation, including a mention and wikilink of Scooter Braun
  • Done.
    • It appears BawinV has an issue with the context I added; I'm not really sure what to do now because I have no experience with good article reviews. Where should this be discussed?

composition and lyrics

• not sure why there's a comma next to "lilting" but that should be removed
  • Done.

critical reception

• Good

commercial performance

• Good

credits and personnel

• Good

charts

• Good

release history

• Good

notes

• Good

references

• refs 5, 12, 16, 22, 24: un-wikilink billboard
  • This isn't really significant, but per MOS:OVERLINK, "Citations stand alone in their usage, so there is no problem with repeating the same link in many citations within an article".

comments

 On hold versacespaceleave a message! 09:49, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

All concerns seem to have been addressed. I'll allow the Scooter Braun pointer to slide below since another editor had an issue with it. I'll ✓ Pass this, thank you. versacespaceleave a message! 21:48, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Oh wow, thank you! This is my first ever good article, and thanks again for passing it. Have a great day. PassedDown (talk | contribs)

• Hi, thanks for reviewing this article! Unfortunately, it's not clear from this review if all the GA criteria have been evaluated. For example, did you check for potential copyright violations, image licensing issues, or if the cited sources back up the statements made in the article? See Wikipedia:Reviewing_good_articles#Assessing_the_article_and_providing_a_review for the guideline on reviewing good articles and the Wikipedia:Good article nominations/templates for helpful templates to make sure you don't forget any of the criteria. (t · c) buidhe 22:59, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

  @Buidhe: Yes, I did review the article according to the listed criteria and did not find any further issues that have not been addressed on this page. If you feel I missed something, please be more specific. versacespaceleave a message! 01:41, 11 July 2021 (UTC)