Talk:York Castle/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:25, 24 November 2010 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

   Fix capitalizations of Pounds, Brown, Cooper. Is there a missing colon in the title of Timbs and Gunn?

Done. Hchc2009 (talk) 22:38, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

1. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

2. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   Is it really appropriate to refer to Victorian prison reform before Victoria ascends the throne in 1837?

Not really! Changed. Hchc2009 (talk) 22:38, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

1. B. Focused:

2. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

3. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

4. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

5. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Nice job, fix these few issues and I'll promote. Have you thought about submitting your castle articles for a MilHist A-class review?--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:25, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

I've been meaning to - will give it a go! Cheers! Hchc2009 (talk) 22:38, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

I don't think that you'd have any problems passing it, based on these two articles.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:29, 24 November 2010 (UTC)