Talk:Yogananda Lakshmi Narasimha Swamy Temple

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by BorgQueen (talk) 16:29, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that the Mattapalli Narasimha Temple provides food and accommodation to pilgrims, serving food to more than a lakh daily? Source: https://web.archive.org/web/20220328181835/https://nijamnews.in/6245
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Arnold Blackner

Created by Veera Narayana (talk). Self-nominated at 16:36, 10 November 2022 (UTC).

• This is only a comment and not a review but I'd highly suggest mentioning 100,000 somewhere in the hook per MOS:INDIA, for the benefit of non-South Asian readers. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 08:12, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

Since the nominator hasn't edited since the day of the nomination, I'm adding an alternative wording below that simplifies the original:

ALT0a ... that the Mattapalli Narasimha Temple provides food and accommodation to more than a hundred thousand pilgrims daily?

Note that 1 lakh is equivalent to a hundred thousand, I used "hundred thousand" instead since I'm not sure if saying "lakh (100,000)" is allowed for DYK hooks.

However, there's now an issue here. The nominator hasn't provided a QPQ within seven days of the nomination (this would be their eighth nomination, so a QPQ is required). As such, the nom has been marked for closure pending a QPQ; the nomination can resume if one is accomplished. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 01:55, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

• The QPQ requirement for this nomination is now five days overdue. As per RfC on excessively late supply of QPQ credits, it should be been completed within one week of nomination. The nomination should not be marked for closure until one week after the nominator was notified. One week from November 17 will be November 24. Flibirigit (talk) 02:38, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
• It's now the 24th and the nominator has not responded. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 05:21, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
  • The request for the overdue QPQ was not made clear on this page until 23 November; the 17 November post to the nominator's talk page was generic, and did not mention the QPQ. One week after 23 November is 30 November, so another day is warranted. I've just repinged the nominator on their talk page to warn them of the impending deadline. They haven't edited since the day this nomination was made; I hope they see this or their talk-page ping. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
• Joofjoof has generously donated a QPQ so this is now ready for a full review. Given that the nominator remains inactive, someone will need to adopt this nomination should any article issues be found. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 06:37, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

- Length, date ok. QPQ requirement ok now. No close paraphrase found. But for the hook, the ref says " అన్నదాన సత్రాలలో రోజుకు లక్ష మందికి పైగానే అన్నదానంను నిర్వహించడానికి ఏర్పాట్లు పూర్తి చేసారు ." (Google translate: "Arrangements have been completed to organize Annadanam for more than one lakh people per day in Annadana satras.")... seems that the ref rather says that temple has capacity to attend over 100,000+ people than that 100,000+ are served daily? --Soman (talk) 14:48, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

The nominator has not edited since November, there are still issues, and no editor has adopted this nomination. Marking for closure as abandoned. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 08:48, 13 January 2023 (UTC)