Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Yoga article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9Auto-archiving period: 180 days |
This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Yoga has been listed as one of the Philosophy and religion good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This level-4 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Baum on Yoga edit
Why do we care?RegentsPark (comment) 00:39, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
Every article needs to be balanced. This page has barely any criticism. In fact, what I added is one of the few critical sentences. WP cares about balance. So should you, RegentsPark. I know you don’t even bother to address me by name.
Instead of an arrogant why do we care? I ask you to engage on a factual editorial level. Reverting is easy- you have reverted my addition of sourced material and language improvements three times without any engagement on the facts.
This is edit warring. In fact, you like the other editor have reverted objective linguistic improvements. The present tense is inappropriate for dated statements, as you should know.--Wuerzele (talk) 00:51, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Wuerzele: Balance is fine but why do we care about a psychiatrist's comments on Yoga? I don't see any point in including this in the article. Please note that it is incumbent on you to seek consensus if your edits are reverted. Also, apologies for not addressing you by name. I didn't think it necessary because I assumed you would be watching this article. RegentsPark (comment) 01:00, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
- "Antonia Baum" is not notable enough to have her own Wikipedia page, so her opinion is WP:UNDUE and irrelevant to the article. WP:BALANCE does not bind here. And calling others
arrogant
wouldn't help your cause either. --WikiLinuz {talk} 01:20, 9 June 2023 (UTC) - Also,
[...] cursed yoga [...]
in your revision is just unencyclopedic and bad English. --WikiLinuz {talk} 01:28, 9 June 2023 (UTC)- As for the 'past tense', it suggests different states of affair in comparison to the specific years added, where this is not the intention of the text. And regarding edit-warring: that's precisely what Wuerzele is doing. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 03:32, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
- "Antonia Baum" is not notable enough to have her own Wikipedia page, so her opinion is WP:UNDUE and irrelevant to the article. WP:BALANCE does not bind here. And calling others