Talk:Yoast SEO

Link spam & Unreliable sources

I've removed a lot of material from the article, including spam links that are clearly part of black hat SEO practice. Also, websites used as sources don't seem to be notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FinanceManToo (talk • contribs) 02:13, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

Article topic: Plugin or company?

Some people in the deletion discussion recommended that this topic should be repurposed to be about the plugin rather than the company as it's the former that may be notable rather than the latter. I have no opinion myself but based on my assessment of the discussion it merits further consideration. Pinging the AFD participants: @Loksmythe, Stefka Bulgaria, Icewhiz, MER-C, Rollidan, Jimbo Wales, Utopes, Lightburst, Prodego, Dream Focus, Gidonb, Cullen328, Kashmiri, HighKing, and Pegnawl:. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:16, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for starting the convo, Jo-Jo. I strongly favor such a repurposing, and am interested if there's any opposition and what the arguments against might be. Certainly in a restructured entry we'd make proper mention of the company + founder, but IMO the encyclopedia would be better served by an article focused on the much acclaimed, oft written about plugin, rather than the company (for which I can't find significant RS). Pegnawl (talk) 23:01, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

• It should be about both. Its fine the way it is now. Dream Focus 23:31, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
• I agree with Dream Focus. I like the article as it is. Lightburst (talk) 01:00, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
• I know this more as a plugin than a company, but would support both. I think the plugin alone merits a Wiki entry. Stefka Bulgaria (talk) 12:40, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

Plugin

• In advance of being brave and since this discussion has already started, take a look at this repurposed page which focuses on the plug-in. Feel free edit as appropriate. HighKing⁺⁺ 18:58, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for the feedback so far on the page. Feel free to edit the sandbox page to make corrections. I aim to put it live early next week. HighKing⁺⁺ 12:51, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

OK. Feedback appears to have dried up now and I suppose the plug-in focussed article is ready to go. I propose to put it live now and feedback/edits can continue on the live article. HighKing⁺⁺ 19:40, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

The article looks good! Stefka Bulgaria (talk) 22:01, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

What does it do?

The article should ideally summarise its features and capabilities. 2A00:23C5:FE0C:2100:65F4:DA65:1B31:DC7B (talk) 12:32, 7 July 2020 (UTC)