Talk:Yellowworld

Demographics

Is there a reputable source that lists the demographics of this site, Yellowworld.org; its members/moderators? I know they had a feud with Blacktokyo.com (a black-American owned site, about blacks in Japan) awhile back, and I know they tend to harass or demean blacks that become temporary members.

From my own experience, as a black-American who joined the site and was himself harassed by members and moderators, I know they were partial (and lenient) to white members; and to whites in general. I think it’s interesting, not only research-wise, but in an ironic sense seeing that the site--according to the article--fought for injustices done to Asians.--Joel Lindley (talk) 19:59, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

Forum Drama

It would be nice if forum drama didn't work its way onto wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.46.164.248 (talk • contribs)

• Well, as this is the internet, with varying points of view, negative/positive, what have you...there will always be 'drama.'

Wikipedia is no different; especially as you sometimes have those who want claim ownership of articles, which usually adds to that drama, despite Wikipedia being open to anyone to edit. However, when two or more people can put aside that drama and at least come to a satistying conclusion (or compromise)at least it allows some to move on temporarily.--Joel Lindley 17:16, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Looks like somebody has a personal vendatta against this website. Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 22:17, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

I wonder who that may be.

Nonetheless, I suggest there be a compromise or 'suggestions' on an edit to satisfy both parties (you and I). Of course, per Wikipedia policy, no personal attacks would (or should) be implemented while we come to a satisfying compromise.--Joel Lindley 22:35, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

I don't see any room for compromise - all you want to do is add a horribly POV statement in the article without any verification or sources whatsoever. That's very bad editing. Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 22:41, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Pretty much the entire article is one POV. As for verification, that is the reason we put a wikipedia tag stating such areas in a certain article needs some sort of back-up information that the original editor, or another, can add in due time.--Joel Lindley 22:47, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

I've taken out the POV statements and added sources. Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 23:14, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Sir, I think we've came to a compromise...

I agree with your changes.=)--Joel Lindley 02:27, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

• http://petition.yellowworld.org/

  Triggered by \bpetition(?:online|s)?\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 18:07, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Yellowworld. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070502051527/http://removecoble.yellowworld.org:80/ to http://removecoble.yellowworld.org/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070604151635/http://anna.yellowworld.org:80/ to http://anna.yellowworld.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:48, 16 January 2016 (UTC)