Talk:Yellow stingray/GA1

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Yzx in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sasata (talk) 19:18, 24 March 2010 (UTC) Hi, I'll be reviewing this article. Comments in a day or 2. Sasata (talk) 19:18, 24 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Excellent work as usual. Just a few comments:

  • wlink/wikt link for reticulations in the lead
  • Done
  • should Urolophus jamaicensis be put as a synonym in the taxobox?
  • My own policy is to only include original combinations in the synonyms box
  • "…and inserts a single claspers into her cloaca." clasper or claspers?
  • Fixed
  • any lifespan info?
  • Added
  • anything worthwhile to add from the following?
Title: A Unique Vascular Configuration among the Efferent Branchial Arteries and Splanchnic Arteries in the Yellow Stingray, Urobatis jamaicensis
Author(s): Basten, BL; Sherman, RL; Lametschwandtner, A, et al.
Source: MICROSCOPY AND MICROANALYSIS Volume: 15 Issue: 3 Pages: 194-196 Published: 2009
Title: Evoked potential audiograms of the nurse shark (Ginglymostoma cirratum) and the yellow stingray (Urobatis jamaicensis)
Author(s): Casper, BM; Mann, DA
Source: ENVIRONMENTAL BIOLOGY OF FISHES Volume: 76 Issue: 1 Pages: 101-108 Published: MAY 2006
Title: Gross brain morphology in the yellow stingray, Urobatis jamaicensis
Author(s): Walker, Brian K.; Sherman, Robin L.
Source: Florida Scientist Volume: 64 Issue: 4 Pages: 246-249 Published: Autumn, 2001
  • I added brief notes about the hearing threshold and the brain size; the circulatory system info is probably too esoteric for the general reader (and for me).


Let me know of further issues. -- Yzx (talk) 18:22, 25 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

All GA criteria are met or exceeded. Sasata (talk) 18:40, 25 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
Thanks! -- Yzx (talk) 19:12, 25 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
    Well written, complies with MoS.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c(OR):  
    All good.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
    All images are PD or appropriately licensed.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail: