Talk:Yarl's Wood Immigration Removal Centre

NPOV

This article reads like a pro-immigrationist website rather than an encyclopaedia entry. Edwin Greenwood (talk) 06:50, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Brodie Clark and February 2002 fire

The following quoted text was added to the description of the February 2002 fire

In early February 2002 "while under the management of Brodie Clark", the ...

No other sections describe who was managing the centre when controversies occurred. IMHO it looks like this is implying blame for him - without providing any supporting evidence or sources for this innuendo. Shouldn't we either be providing supporting reasons for why he is singled out? Or maybe list all managers of the centre? Or none? Only identifying one - and linking him to a problem there looks biased.

Not convinced the sentence "Although there was an investigation, no members of Group 4 were ever prosecuted. " is fair to all the Group 4 staff. But none of them have been individually identified, so I am less concerned about that statement.

This is not based on any knowledge I have of the incident - but on the impression I received when reading the article. Holland jon (talk) 19:51, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Yarl's Wood Immigration Removal Centre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081230152030/http://www.ppo.gov.uk:80/download/special-investigation-reports/special-yarls-wood-abuse-03.pdf to http://www.ppo.gov.uk/download/special-investigation-reports/special-yarls-wood-abuse-03.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090110193459/http://www.allwomencount.net:80/EWC%20LAW/womenagainstlaw.htm to http://www.allwomencount.net/EWC%20LAW/womenagainstlaw.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:03, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Detention of pregnant women

Is this not worth mentioning? The House of Lords voted to end it, but still. Shiningroad (talk) 18:01, 25 June 2016 (UTC)