Talk:Yael Hochberg
Latest comment: 5 days ago by Clearfrienda in topic Comments left by AfC reviewers
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
WP:THREE Sources
editI believe the below three sources cited in my article meet Wikipedia's standards:
1. LeVota, Meghan. "Kauffman honoree examines impact of accelerators on an ecosystem". Startland News. Retrieved 6 March 2024.
2. Carter, Andrea (16 April 2015). "2015 Best 40 Under 40 Professors: Yael Hochberg, Rice University Jones School". Poets & Quants. Retrieved 19 May 2023.
3. "The Ewing Marion Kauffman Prize Medal for Distinguished Research in Entrepreneurship". Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation. Retrieved 19 May 2023.
Thank you in advance for taking the time to review! Brick1329 (talk) 19:15, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
COI
editI have no conflict of interest re. this article's subject. Brick1329 (talk) 19:15, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
Comments left by AfC reviewers
edit
Comment: Well done on creating the draft. It likely meets the relevant requirements (including WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO, WP:NPROF) but requires at least some reliable sources. As you may know, Wikipedia's basic requirement for entry is that the subject is notable. Essentially subjects are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. To properly create such a draft page, please see the articles ‘Your First Article’, ‘Referencing for Beginners’ and ‘Easier Referencing for Beginners’. Please note that some of the references are broken and link to pages that do not load. Additionally, the draft tends to read too much like a CV, which Wikipedia is not. Also, if you have any connection to the subject, including being paid, you have a conflict of interest that you must declare on your Talk page (to see instructions on how to do this please click the link). Please familiarise yourself with these pages before amending the draft. If you feel you can meet these requirements (it would help our volunteer reviewers by identifying, on the draft's talk page, the WP:THREE best sources that establish notability of the subject) then resubmit the page and leave a note for me on my talk page and I would be happy to reassess. Cabrils (talk) 05:03, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Cabrils and Brick1329: Why do you believe this article is notable? I don't see how it meets WP:GNG with the WP:THREE listed: Source 1 is probably the best but definitely isn't great. There's almost nothing about Startland online so I can't say if it's reliable or not. Poets and Quants appears to be a blog and there's no indication of reliability. Regardless, it's mostly just an interview transcript with no other coverage or commentary so it doesn't really count towards notability. Source 3 is the award press release, which is a WP:RS for verifying the award but doesn't help with notability. I can't find anything else online about her. She seems to be a WP:RUNOFTHEMILL professor and doesn't meet WP:NPROF. The best bet for notability is probably WP:ANYBIO criteria 1 with the Ewing Marion Kauffman Prize Medal for Distinguished Research in Entrepreneurship award, though I don't know if it'd be considered a "well-known and significant award or honor." C F A 💬 00:00, 17 June 2024 (UTC)