This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
A company's own "philosophy" is generally irrelevant for an encyclopedic article (just like its "mission", "vision", and similar PR fluff). Content should reflect what independent reliable sources report about the topic, not how a company would like to present itself and its products (WP:NPOV). Also, a non-expert blog post - a blatant advertorial in this case - is not a reliable source (WP:RS). GermanJoe (talk) 19:18, 20 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
