Talk:YES stroke alphabetical order
Latest comment: 2 months ago by Ctxz2323 in topic Declaration of authorship
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
expansion of a section
editThis article is an expansion of a section in article stroke-based sorting, which has been reviewed and rated B class. Ctxz2323 (talk) 06:31, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Appendix: 20,902 CJK Unified Ideographs (Unicode block) in YES order
editDear Bedivere (talk · contribs),
Thank you for your interest to the article. May I know why "Appendix: 20,902 CJK Unified Ideographs (Unicode block) in YES order" is deleted? It is my own product, and there is no copyright issue. Ctxz2323 (talk) 03:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- I don't know what you're talking about. If you are referring to a file of Commons, I suggest you take this issue there. So far I don't remember (not that I didn't) deleting such a file, but even if I did, it would need permission so I also suggest you contact commons:COM:VRT. Good day Bedivere (talk) 03:36, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- It is not a file of Commons, it is an Appendix section of a normal Wikipedia article, with the history record copied as follows:
- "curprev 13:41, 7 April 2024 Bedivere talk contribs 12,437 bytes −62,927 →Appendix: 20,902 CJK Unified Ideographs (Unicode block) in YES order undothank ".
- Maybe it was deleted accidently if you do not remember. Can I put it back? Ctxz2323 (talk) 09:51, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Ah, yes, I don't remember removing it though, I may have thought it was mistakenly added in the first place. I would suggest you to remove it as it is too long, it is in a foreign language/alphabet and it could be considered by fellow editors as unencyclopedic. I think you could submit it to the Chinese edition of Wikisource and link it from here. That would be the best approach. Bedivere (talk) 01:44, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks.
- Maybe I will create an independent list and have it linked to the present article.
- As a matter of fact, there is a list of the same CJK Chinese character set on wikipedia English, in Unicode radical-based order.
- Before the list is done, I would like to keep the appendix, as it is an important part of the article. Ctxz2323 (talk) 02:07, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Have just made it collapsible, hidden in default state. Ctxz2323 (talk) 05:42, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Ah, yes, I don't remember removing it though, I may have thought it was mistakenly added in the first place. I would suggest you to remove it as it is too long, it is in a foreign language/alphabet and it could be considered by fellow editors as unencyclopedic. I think you could submit it to the Chinese edition of Wikisource and link it from here. That would be the best approach. Bedivere (talk) 01:44, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
Declaration of authorship
editI would like to declare that, as you can find out from my user page User:Ctxz2323, I am an author or co-author of some of the sources here. However, the main ideas of YES sorting was first introduced in another source:
Li, Xiaotong (李笑通) (2011). 汉字 “笔形笔顺排检法” 的设计与应用 (Design and Application of a New Method for Sorting and Retrieving Chinese Characters according to the Stroke Form and Stroke Order (MA thesis)) (in Chinese). Hong Kong: Department of Chinese and Bilingual Studies, Hong Kong Polytechnic University.. Ctxz2323 (talk) 23:09, 28 May 2024 (UTC)