Talk:Y.1564

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Cyberbot II in topic External links modified

It is suggested to remove the paragraphs describing RFC 2544 as it may divert readers or cause confusion, as it takes the prime location in the article. The references and links to the RFC 2544 article are already there and they should be sufficient.

Y.1564 EMIX information

edit

What is the source or authority of this statement: "...Test Flow is also able to consist of up to 5 different frame sizes called an EMIX (Ethernet Mix)..."? Specifically, "up to 5..." does not seem to be spelled out in the ITU spec or any supporting documentation as far as I can find. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mawcs (talkcontribs) 13:53, 3 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Merge with page 'Y.156sam'

edit

Y.156sam was the provisional name for this standard before it was published and assigned a number (Y.1564) by ITU, so both pages are refering to the same thing. See http://www.itu.int/ITU-T/recommendations/rec.aspx?rec=11080 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.38.209.13 (talk) 17:27, 4 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on ITU-T Y.1564. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:59, 22 March 2016 (UTC)Reply