unverified claims? edit

If the origin of the garment is unknown, how is it there is evidence that show it is or isn't from China? If it has been proven by scholars that it did not come from China, then please site the reference material that verifies this. Making sweeping statements about its origins without reference/or references that has nothing to do with the Vietnamese origins of the garment isn't helping. You are welcome to undo my changes if you can show references that backs up your sweeping claims. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.48.85.68 (talk) 15:48, 28 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

If you read the source and do some research on Dudou, it only appears since the Qing dynasty (near modern time) whereas Vietnamese yếm had existed since ancient time. Furthermore, this garment is often associated with peasant women in Vietnam so the chance that they picked up something from Qing dynasty China is low. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.187.179.143 (talk) 06:47, 24 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
a. None of the current sources are terribly authoritative. b. Which one did you have in mind? c. The chance that any given aspect of traditional Viet peasant culture came from China or was glossed in existing records in Sinicized terms is exceedingly high, not "low". d. "Ancient" in both Vietnam and China is a lousy translation of words that are used to simply refer to pre-colonial or pre-revolutionary eras. "Ancient" is used to describe Vietnam in bad sources (as these are) all the way up to the French conquest; it's used in Chinese sources all the way into the 20th century. — LlywelynII 15:42, 5 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Just to be clear edit

The page is here because the Vietnamese project passed a LOCALCONSENSUS that everything should be rendered in tones. This is not the garment's actual COMMON ENGLISH name and, even if the page is kept here as a NATURALDAB, the article shouldn't lead with the tonal Vietnamese form or treat it as though it were actually English. — LlywelynII 15:42, 5 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Yếm. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:03, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Reason why I delete some parts in the article edit

This article had been manipulated by a sock puppet name Rajmaan and their bot Milktaco who owned by a Chinese lives in Singapore and they keep spreading nonstoppable hoaxes. I just have uphold my right to protect Vietnamese wiki against vandalism and sockpuppeters. Trương guy (talk) 09:24, 26 December 2020 (UTC)Reply