Talk:Xue Susu/GA1
Latest comment: 11 years ago by QatarStarsLeague in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: QatarStarsLeague (talk · contribs) 03:42, 9 June 2013 (UTC) The last analogous article was a nice experience. QatarStarsLeague (talk) 03:42, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Criteria
editGood Article Status - Review Criteria
A good article is—
- Well-written:
- (a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and
- (b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.[1]
- Verifiable with no original research:
- (a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
- (b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose);[2] and
- (c) it contains no original research.
- Broad in its coverage:
- (a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic;[3] and
- (b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
- Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
- Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. [4]
- Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: [5]
- (a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content; and
- (b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.[6]
Review
edit- Well-written:
- Verifiable with no original research:
- Broad in its coverage:
- Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
- Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
- Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
Criteria | Notes | Result |
---|---|---|
(a) (prose) | See below for specified issues. UPDATE: Have been addressed. | Pass |
(b) (MoS) | Pass. | Pass |
Criteria | Notes | Result |
---|---|---|
(a) (references) | Pass. | Pass |
(b) (citations to reliable sources) | Yes. | Pass |
(c) (original research) | None detected. | Pass |
Criteria | Notes | Result |
---|---|---|
(a) (major aspects) | Pass. | Pass |
(b) (focused) | Pass. | Pass |
Notes | Result |
---|---|
Pass here. | Pass |
Notes | Result |
---|---|
Pass here. | Pass |
Result
editResult | Notes |
---|---|
Undetermined | The reviewer has no notes here. |
Discussion
editThe comprehensive review has not yet started; I have reviewed the images however. QatarStarsLeague (talk) 03:25, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
- Image PD tags fixed, thanks. Yunshui 雲水 07:55, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Lead & Infobox
editFine here.
Biography
edit"...among the literati and government official who..." Plural form of officials
Does Qian Qianyi garner a wikilink?
- Pluralised "officials", good spot. Qian Qianyi is wikilinked, so I'm not sure what you mean - are you suggesting it shouldn't be? Yunshui 雲水 21:52, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
- I've also change "eremite" in the lead back to "recluse" - for most English-speakers, "eremite" is a comparatively archaic reading of hermit, and she wasn't really a hermit in the sense that the word is usually used in English; her retirement from the world doesn't seem to have been a full-on cave-in-the-desert job - she just stopped going out much! Yunshui 雲水 21:52, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
- My mistake, and I see. QatarStarsLeague (talk) 22:28, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
- I've also change "eremite" in the lead back to "recluse" - for most English-speakers, "eremite" is a comparatively archaic reading of hermit, and she wasn't really a hermit in the sense that the word is usually used in English; her retirement from the world doesn't seem to have been a full-on cave-in-the-desert job - she just stopped going out much! Yunshui 雲水 21:52, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Paintings
editFine here.
Poetry
editExcellent.
Archery
editIntriguing, as well as excellent.
Conclusion
editThis is a fine article. Once everything above has been mitigated, it will pass. Congratulations! QatarStarsLeague (talk) 21:10, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Additional Notes
edit- ^ Compliance with other aspects of the Manual of Style, or the Manual of Style mainpage or subpages of the guides listed, is not required for good articles.
- ^ Either parenthetical references or footnotes can be used for in-line citations, but not both in the same article.
- ^ This requirement is significantly weaker than the "comprehensiveness" required of featured articles; it allows shorter articles, articles that do not cover every major fact or detail, and overviews of large topics.
- ^ Vandalism reversions, proposals to split or merge content, good faith improvements to the page (such as copy editing), and changes based on reviewers' suggestions do not apply. Nominations for articles that are unstable because of unconstructive editing should be placed on hold.
- ^ Other media, such as video and sound clips, are also covered by this criterion.
- ^ The presence of images is not, in itself, a requirement. However, if images (or other media) with acceptable copyright status are appropriate and readily available, then some such images should be provided.