Talk:Xpu Há

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Comments edit

According to the article, this area has two residents. It would help a lot if the article were a bit clearer on exactly what this place is. Is it a government-recognized entity, a location included on maps because of the presence of the businesses, basically a tourist attraction, or what? Also, if any of the businesses are part of chains which have extant articles, specific references to them could easily be included. John Carter (talk) 20:33, 3 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Another paradise giving way to the All-Inclusives... edit

Beaches X-1 through X-5 and the small, rustic mini-hotels, guest houses and cantinas is all but gone now thanks to unchecked development.

This long, white sandy strip of beach is probably the best and the best kept secret on the Yucatan penninsula. It was not unusual to see nude folks, but was never a cruising spot. The water is crystal clear and the walkable sand bar quite long.

Progress? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.191.150.24 (talk) 05:06, 15 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Xpu Há. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:22, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Reply