This page is written in bad English. It is, on it's author's admission, about new software (so can hardly be notable). The praise for the software's efficiency and ease of use is asserted but not supported with any external, independent source.
It links to the software's web site, which would be reasonable if other requirements for a Wikipedia entry were met, but it is hard to see why a link to the "Official New Zealand homepage" is anything but an attempt to draw traffic.
This is an ad. Argey 14:24, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
81.232.110.21 has removed my tags on the acceptability of this article as a Wikipedia entry. This page is still an ad. It now has two links to xmind's site and there is no explanation on this discussion page of why the queries on notability, bad writing and npov were removed. I believe they still apply and have therefore reinstated them.
Argey 03:31, 11 October 2007 (UTC)