Talk:Xiaozhai Tiankeng

Learn more about this page

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Geology Low‑importance

	Geology portal Talk:Xiaozhai Tiankeng is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

China

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

External link

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Would it be OK to add this external link to Heavenly pit to the bottom of the article under External links ? --Ancheta Wis (talk | contribs) 12:57, 29 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

A waterfall 4-meters high?

Latest comment: 6 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Under the heading "Underground river and cave" it states that the river "...reaches a vertical cliff above the Migong River, forming a 4-meter high waterfall." Elsewhere I have seen this waterfall's height described as being 46-meters tall, which sounds more realistic, given that a "4-meter high waterfall" would barely be noticeable. Can anyone confirm this? Bricology (talk) 06:29, 21 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Bricology Reference 1 says 46 m. This is probably just a typo. Dgndenver (talk) 15:58, 26 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic