Talk:Xfig

Latest comment: 4 years ago by 2A02:6D40:3485:2101:B8F6:468:D0E0:72A7 in topic 3.2.7b October 2019 available

Shouldn't the title be xfig? (x and f both non-capitalized). If so, the lowercase template can be added. - Liberatore(T) 21:07, 19 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

"Professor Stanisic loves xfig." - does that belong into wikipedia? 91.89.64.85 11:19, 2 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Nope, just remove it! ----Johnm4 09:17, 4 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Can xfig really import SVG? My version cannot and SVG is not mentioned in http://epb.lbl.gov/xfig/frm_main_menus.html. Am I just stupid? 193.166.223.5 (talk) 14:51, 7 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

AFAIK Xfig can only export to SVG, not import. guillom 10:07, 24 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yup, no import of SVG, only export. See the additional section "Imports" I just added Bvsmith 00:48, 2 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

There's an error in the use of term "import" in this article: XFig does not /import/ eps, etc. its can /include/ pictures in such formats. For instance, it is not possible to get the vector objects out of the .eps an save them in .fig format, .eps are simply /included/ as bitmaps... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.164.255.87 (talk) 12:51, 15 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

It might be nice if anyone could add something about maintainance: Who, if anyone, is maintaining XFig. I have a particular interest since I use it a lot, and therefore think it would be nice to spread the word. Jpgcwiki (talk) 20:20, 3 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

I wonder if xfig is still maintained, given that the last stable release is from 2009. Am I wrong? Could the article give a hint about it? Furthermore, what is the popularity of this software? Given that I believe it is popular and its licence is GPL, I'd suppose there would be active developers. Where am I wrong in my reasoning? To me it is unclear if the status of development of xfig is really active ; there are only a few bugs corrections in the 2008-2009 area and nothing after that... 93.2.131.148 (talk) 22:58, 6 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Xfig. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:44, 16 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Xfig. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:36, 20 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Xfig. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:45, 4 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Xfig. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:10, 11 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Does it really run on MS Windows and Mac? edit

If this is built for Xlib, how is it going to run on Windows and Mac OS? Where are there any Windows or Mac executables? Please explain in the article.CountMacula (talk) 19:44, 9 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

@MicahDCochran: added it in Special:Diff/411738450. I use Xfig in Cygwin, but I would reduce the OS just to Linux.  — Johannes Kalliauer - contrib. 20:27, 9 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for the diff. I'm thinking the same, but that perhaps Cygwin should be mentioned. Maybe the Windows port that costs should be described briefly in the article. And Mac is mentioned in relation to mouse buttons. That seems odd, as it's not clear that there is a Mac version.CountMacula (talk) 01:06, 13 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

3.2.7b October 2019 available edit

Version 3.2.7b October 2019 available — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:6D40:3485:2101:B8F6:468:D0E0:72A7 (talk) 18:15, 11 March 2020 (UTC)Reply