Talk:Xenosaga I & II/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Freikorp (talk · contribs) 11:34, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   Can "ether" or "ether points" by wikilinked to something? Or just clarified to the reader? I have the feeling non-gamers will have no idea what ether is.

   I'd wikilink "voice work" to Voice acting.

   I'd change "and required rewrites" to "requiring rewrites".

   You've got one sentence starting with "A major change" and the next starting with "A major issue". I'd slightly reword one of them.

   "reaching #15" - see MOS:HASH

   Grammar error - change "while another found" to "another reviewer found"

   "and it being in Japanese was a barrier" - this seems like awkward working, how about ", also citing the game being in Japanese as a barrier".

   "and praised the battle" - I'd change this to "also praising the battle".

   Actually you've got four uses of "praise" in the final paragraph. Mix it up a little.

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Has an appropriate reference section:

   B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail: Well done overall. Putting this one on hold while minor issues are addressed. Freikorp (talk) 11:58, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

@Freikorp: All issues addressed. --ProtoDrake (talk) 12:24, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Happy to pass this. Congrats. Freikorp (talk) 15:26, 9 September 2017 (UTC)