This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Malaysia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Malaysia and Malaysia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MalaysiaWikipedia:WikiProject MalaysiaTemplate:WikiProject MalaysiaMalaysia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
@DonFB: There is a POV cleanup tag on this article, but I don't notice anything wrong with the article's "neutrality." Can you explain why you added this cleanup tag? Jarble (talk) 20:40, 25 June 2017 (UTC)Reply
Upon re-visiting this article, I believe it should not be a standalone, but should be merged as a few sentences into the Malaysia article. As currently written, it is quite one-sided, and no one (myself included) has attempted to provide referenced rebuttals or rejoinders. As an independent article, it is seriously unbalanced; if the content is included as part of the overall country article, the issue can be seen as one among many about the challenges and problems which may affect that or any country. DonFB (talk) 06:11, 27 June 2017 (UTC)Reply
