Talk:Xanadu (musical)

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 136.159.160.121 in topic Context needed for category

Cheyenne Jackson

edit

The article presently state Cheyenne Jackson dropped out of the cast of the musical production. This is not true. And in fact the article mentions him starring in the musical further down. I saw the show, for the third time, again tonight (5/13/2008) and he is still starring in it.-- 11:17, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Keep reading the next paragraph. Jackson was in the workshop, but he was not available for the show. James Carpinello was originally cast as Sonny, but he injured himself on June 12. By that time, Jackson was available again and joined the cast. Also, new messages go at the bottom of the talk page, not at the top. -- Ssilvers (talk) 07:11, 14 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Evil Woman

edit

According to Playbill, "Evil Woman" is a song added to the show. I had put it into the song list (not sure where it goes, but it seemed like it was in the second half), and someone deleted it. Who sings it, and where does it go in the song list? Best regards, -- Ssilvers 12:58, 24 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

I think "Evil Woman" is back in the song list. Thanks--Broadwaygal 14:33, 24 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
Oh, OK. I see that it was moved up to the first half. Best regards, -- Ssilvers 14:59, 24 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Assessment

edit

I assessed this as a B. It has a good synopsis and about all the background and production information that is available. -- Ssilvers 05:19, 26 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

I see your logic, but I'm going to shift it to "Start," because as soon as it opens, there will be far more available; also, the synopsis seems incredibly detailed, which drags down the article a bit. Lawikitejana 12:59, 27 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Reviews

edit

WP is not an advertisement. If you want to quote from the review, make sure your quote is EXACT. The headline of the review is not part of the review and was likely written by an editor. Please read WP:NPOV. -- Ssilvers 18:50, 15 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

I deleted a large part of each of the reviews because: 1) it read a bit too much like a "fan" or "press agent" or --it needs to be said again -- advertising (see:Wikipedia is not an advertising service. Promotional articles about yourself, your friends, your company or products, or articles created as part of a marketing or promotional campaign, will be deleted in accordance with our deletion policies. For more information, please see Wikipedia:Spam.) 2) seemed to me to be close--if not actually in violation of :[1]. JeanColumbia 11:01, 16 August 2007 (UTC)Reply
I agree, Jean, but you deleted all the criticism and kept only the praise. I have attempted to re-balance the quoted extracts. Looks OK? -- Ssilvers 16:03, 16 August 2007 (UTC)Reply
Oops, didn't mean to get it so unbalanced! Better now, yes. (Here I am criticizing the "fan" aspects, and I did a very fan-like edit.My bad.)JeanColumbia 16:57, 16 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Kerry.jpg

edit
 

Image:Kerry.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 01:29, 24 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Kerry.jpg

edit
 

Image:Kerry.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 00:22, 26 July 2007 (UTC)Reply


All over the world

edit

Does anyone know if the broadway production is using the original lyrics for this song? Namely...

".. London, Hamburg, Paris, Rome, Rio, Hong Kong, Tokyo L.A., New York, Amsterdam, Monte Carlo and Shard End" (UTC)

Marcus22 11:20, 19 August 2007 (UTC)Reply


Yes they do say that line in that order I believe. Just saw the musical again tonight (5/13/2008) again for the third time. (UTC)


Fair use rationale for Image:Cheyenne,Kerry,kiss.jpg

edit
 

Image:Cheyenne,Kerry,kiss.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 10:47, 27 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:XanaduBroadway.jpg

edit
 

Image:XanaduBroadway.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:46, 30 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

I added a fair use summary. -- Ssilvers (talk) 06:23, 30 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
edit

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://mtishows.com/show_detail.asp?showid=000347. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 21:07, 29 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Xanadu (musical). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:19, 16 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on Xanadu (musical). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:09, 20 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Context needed for category

edit

One thing Wikipedia lacks is a "citation needed" tag for categories. So consider this one for the "LGBT-related musicals" tag. There is nothing in the article to support its inclusion, so more context is needed. I don't see anything in the article on the original film either. 136.159.160.121 (talk) 17:09, 20 June 2023 (UTC)Reply