Talk:X v United Kingdom
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the X v United Kingdom article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Article is VERY wrong
editFirst of all the case of X v United Kingdom is not application 7215/75 but 7525/76. 7215/75 deals with the mentally unstable and their treatment in "insane asylums". Secondly the "case" (not a case but an application at the Commission) of X v United Kingdom was NOT decided as written here. X' application (with number 7525/76 - http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/webservices/content/pdf/001-74410) was deemed acceptable. Afterwards when the European Court had to decide the case was re-named to Dudgeon v United Kingdom. (See this page - http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/Pages/search.aspx#{"appno":["7525/76"]}) So I am not sure which case this page is talking about but NOTHING is correct on this page. I recommend merging this page with the one on Dudgeon v the United Kingdom.
Greetz
Frank (PhD. researcher in Human Rights law @ Stockholm University) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.11.155.66 (talk) 16:17, 27 May 2013 (UTC)