Talk:Wyvern Rhadamanthys
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
Not notable
editI very much doubt that this article meets the guidelines for notability for fiction. Can anyone find any coverage in reliable, independent sources??
From Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#PLOT:
- Wikipedia articles on published works (such as fictional stories) should cover their real-world context and sourced analysis, offering detail on a work's development, impact or historical significance, not solely a detailed summary of that work's plot. This applies both to stand-alone works, and also to series. A brief plot summary may sometimes be appropriate as an aspect of a larger topic.
From Wikipedia:Notability:
- A topic is presumed to be notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.
For articles on fiction, reliable sources may cover such things as design, development, reception and cultural impact. This is real-world coverage because it describes the real-world aspects of the work. Fictional coverage describes the work's fictional elements, such as the setting, characters, and story.
Based on this reasoning and the above excerpts, fictional concepts can be presumed notable if they have received significant real-world coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. However, notability for individual topics on fiction should be judged on a case-by-case basis while following Wikipedia's core policies of verifiability, no original research and neutral point of view. Fences and windows (talk) 20:40, 14 April 2008 (UTC)