Talk:Wynebald de Ballon

Latest comment: 11 years ago by Smalljim in topic Original research tag

No reasons given for "Refimprove" tag

edit

I have removed the above tag, copied here, because despite the listing of copious footnotes and sources in the article, the affixer of this tag has given no indication of what improvements are required. If the editor wishes to re-affix the tag, please do so again, but please state reasons in a constructive manner, so the article can be improved accordingly. Such a tag without an indication of the perceived problem is unproductive. The tag removed is as follows: (Refimprove|date=November 2010). (Lobsterthermidor (talk) 14:30, 24 December 2010 (UTC))Reply

Original research tag

edit

This article was entirely created by now-retired User:Lobsterthermidor. As explained here, his contributions, though well-intentioned, were problematical due to the persistent integration of original research among the referenced parts, making it very difficult to disentangle the reliable content from his own interpretations, speculation, personal opinions and comments.

Until this issue can be resolved, readers should treat the article with caution and should do their own research to verify any information they take from here.  —SMALLJIM  12:36, 31 July 2013 (UTC)Reply