Talk:Worst Episode Ever/GA1

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Ruby2010 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ruby2010 comment! 16:42, 14 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Comments

edit
  • Wiklink first mention of Comic Book Guy in lead
  • Wikilink The Android Dungeon in lead
  • Sentences with quotes need citations
  • LA Times, Seattle Times are italicized
  • Wikilink IGN in ref
  • Ref 12: use consistent date formatting

On hold for seven days while above minor issues get addressed. Ruby2010 comment! 20:51, 15 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

All done! Thanks for the review. Theleftorium (talk) 21:16, 15 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
Looks great. Pass for GA. Ruby2010 comment! 21:52, 15 August 2011 (UTC)Reply