Talk:Workplace romance
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 14 January 2018. The result of the discussion was redirect. |
What...? edit
This strikes me as a VERY strangely worded article and full of broad statements that may fall under weasel words or just don't match wikipedia's tone. There are not nearly enough citations citing all of the opinions posted. I'm thinking this article may not be able to be fixed other than re-writing the whole thing. But it seems to be abandoned as of november 201268.2.37.244 (talk) 15:46, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
I think this is still an educational assignment. Right now it reads like a combination between a personal essay, a book review (of the one book cited in note 2), and an advice manual. In addition, I'm sure there's a logic to the similar usernames (see User talk:MGMT90018 2015S2 Workplace romance), but who does what is very unclear to the rest of us. Drmies (talk) 02:15, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment edit
This article is the subject of an educational assignment at James Madison University supported by WikiProject Organizational Communication theory or practice and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2011 Q3 term. Further details are available on the course page.
The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}} by PrimeBOT (talk) on 16:43, 2 January 2023 (UTC)