Talk:Working holiday visa

Latest comment: 6 months ago by Fjii in topic Flag icons

Notes edit

I believe that Cyprus also allows for working holiday visas for young New Zealanders and Australians

Australians working in Ireland edit

I am currently working in Ireland with a working holiday visa, and my visa says that Australian holders of the same visa may not work in any job for more than 3 months. I believe this is because Australia enforces the same restriction on people working in their country. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cjsedwards (talkcontribs) 15:31, 30 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

i'm malaysia passport holder, anyplace i can go for working holiday?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.50.0.180 (talk) 09:07, 17 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Singapore

The link in the Singapore section is broken. I'm not sure of the correct link, but if someone could find out, that'd be great. 15:11, 31 August 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Robertsimpson1401 (talkcontribs)

USA entry edit

The Entry for the USA seems to be totally different from the rest of the page. Instead of showing what countries can come to the USA for Working Holidays, it talks about the countries US citizens can go to. Perhaps it needs to be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scathsealgaire (talkcontribs) 06:38, 1 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

I don't think the descriptions of "similar" US visas are similar enough to the working holiday program used by other countries to warrant placement on this page. Zaurus (talk) 17:44, 11 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
I removed J-1 section. I can also not find any info about SWAP on source given [1], so suggest removing that part of USA Entry too. Zaurus (talk) 17:50, 11 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
I really don't see any relation between any of the US visas listed here on the the intent of the work holiday visa of: working holiday visa enables them to experience living in a foreign country without undergoing the usual costly expenses of finding work sponsorship in advance or going on expensive university exchange programmes. I'm removing the USA Entry. --Zaurus (talk) 01:08, 31 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Think we might want to remove references to USA under Portugal, as the "Memorandum of Understanding between the Government of Portugal and the Government of the United States of America" had conditions closer inline with student exchanges than working holiday.[2] --Zaurus (talk) 02:02, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. ^ "U.S. Department of State". Retrieved 5 February 2016.
  2. ^ "U.S.-Portugal MOU Establishes Pilot Program for Students and Entrepreneurs". U.S. Embassy & Consulate in Portugal. 13 February 2019.

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Working holiday visa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:35, 12 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Why does this article contain? edit

Why does this article contain a list of each countries' working holiday visa conditions? We aren't a guide and this information can date very quickly. I propose the list of countries and conditions be removed. - Shiftchange (talk) 10:09, 25 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Working holiday visa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:49, 2 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Notes edit

New Zealand Citizens can get a work visa for Canada until age 35 inclusive

http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/work/iec/eligibility.asp?country=nz&cat=wh — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.13.10.210 (talk) 22:10, 7 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Czech Republic and Japan edit

As the agreement between the Czech Republic and Japan has not entered into force yet, the information in sections 1.15 and 1.29 is incorrect.

Also, the Czech Republic's working holiday visas are not issued with 2-year validity but only 1-year validity. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.130.168.30 (talk) 13:56, 14 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Australia and Peru edit

There is a work & holiday scheme between Australia and Peru - see http://www.consulado.pe/es/Sydney/tramite/Paginas/Visas/WorkandHolidayAusEn.aspx — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.130.168.30 (talk) 13:58, 14 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Working holiday visa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:09, 8 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (January 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Working holiday visa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:21, 24 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Everything With Korea edit

Literally every section that has an agreement with Korea needs verification, and the citations are not always good. Flag emojis in place of country names are also quite jarring.

Anyone who can read Korean, please take a moment to look at some of Korea's online regulations, as many are inaccessible to researchers who don't read Korean.

I have deleted it as we already have a section on South Korea. Not sure why my deletion was Reverted.--Zaurus (talk) 16:26, 18 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

In the South Korea section there is a long list of "citizens of" territories, islands etc, many of which are not countries and therefore do not have citizenship. None of this has citations. I have restored the tag [Many territories on this list are not countries and do not have their own citizenship.].

Unless the editor responsible for all this addresses this issue, I propose to delete the whole section as uncited.---Ehrenkater (talk) 07:21, 4 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Flag icons edit

What's with the tacky addition of flag icons, this is suppose to be an encyclopedic entry not a discord server Fjii (talk) 23:37, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply