Talk:WordPerfect
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Wasted Time R in topic "Faithful customers"
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the WordPerfect article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This page is not a forum for general discussion about WordPerfect. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about WordPerfect at the Reference desk. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 Archives (Index) |
|
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
Two decades? edit
The "Key characteristics" section has this sentence, which is confusing:
WordPerfect users were never forced to upgrade for compatibility reasons for more than two decades.
Why does it refer to both "never" and "for more than two decades"? And which two decades is it referring to? Jkshapiro (talk) 17:14, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
- Just put rewrite as "For more than twenty years, WordPerfect users were never forced to upgrade for compatibility reasons." 166.70.61.76 (talk) 20:24, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
"Faithful customers" edit
This section has the following quote relying on a 23-year old citation: "Among the remaining avid users of WordPerfect are many law firms and government offices,[3] . . ."
I suggest we delete this whole section, or rewrite it with more up-to-date information.
Lenehey (talk) 20:33, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
- I've changed the tenses within the section and have added a cite from 2022. Wasted Time R (talk) 10:24, 26 April 2023 (UTC)