This article was nominated for merging with List of generation VIII Pokémon on August 6, 2023. The result of the discussion (permanent link) was Kept. |
This article was nominated for deletion on 21 July 2021. The result of the discussion was keep. |
Wooloo has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: August 10, 2023. (Reviewed version). |
This article was nominated for merging with List of generation VIII Pokémon on 6 August 2023. The result of the discussion (permanent link) was not merged. |
There’s really no use for this article edit
I really don’t know why this page really exists. I mean, what’s the purpose…? Sure, it was fan-influential, but I whymake a Wikipedia article for this pokemon in particular? What are you planning to do, make articles for ‘em all? I don’t know…I think this is useless as long as Bulbapedia exists.. Inaturlist Lover (talk) 12:18, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
GA Review edit
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Wooloo/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Brachy0008 (talk · contribs) 09:23, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Review edit
Hello! I will be reviewing the article. I am honoured to do so, as I’m kind of a Pokémon fan myself (guess my favourite Pokémon if you want to, but I can confirm it is not Wooloo). So far, the significant problem is the MoS violations.
Prose edit
- A mention of Shigeru Ohmori’s reaction to the critical reception of the Pokémon is not present in the prose, despite being in the lead.
- It should be there, first paragraph of reception, by his last name.
- Done!
- It should be there, first paragraph of reception, by his last name.
Sources/Citations edit
- (Optional) Try adding secondary sources, but I’ll leave them be if such sources are not available. I helped you with one of them.
- The only concern, the overuse of FN 7 (primary source). It’s used four times on this page.
- Should be fixed now. Fixed an oversight with a few missing accessdate.
- Done.
- Should be fixed now. Fixed an oversight with a few missing accessdate.
Copy-vios edit
- Nothing special from Earwig, but I’ll let that 26.5% be.
Images edit
- So far, so good!
- (Optional) If you can, try adding more Wooloo pics.
- I fear given the size of the article adding more than one might get called out for fair use rationale if I add another.
- That’s why it’s optional
- I fear given the size of the article adding more than one might get called out for fair use rationale if I add another.
@Brachy0008: Everything should be addressed!--Kung Fu Man (talk) 10:06, 10 August 2023 (UTC)