Talk:Wool town

East Anglia Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject East Anglia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of East Anglia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.East AngliaWikipedia:WikiProject East AngliaTemplate:WikiProject East AngliaEast Anglia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Economics Low‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 1 October 2020 edit

Latest comment: 3 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved(non-admin closure) Megan☺️ ^{Talk to the monster} 18:27, 8 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Wool towns → Wool town – Shouldn't this be singular per WP:PLURAL noting at Boxford, Suffolk it is linked as such. However the Suffolk Wool Towns website and Visit Suffolk use the plural. However as can be seen in the article it deals with places outside Suffolk. If it is a proper noun referring specifically to the ones in Suffolk then surely it would be Wool Towns (capital "T") but if its generic then it should be singular as noted per PLURAL similar to the fact that the article about the animal is at Dog not Dogs though the latter is a primary redirect. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:41, 1 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Move to Wool town: As nom said, per WP:PLURAL article names should be in their singular form. In the case of the websites, they make it grammatically correct by adding an article "the" before Wool Towns, though articles are generally not used at the start of article titles. — Yours, Berrely • ^Talk∕_Contribs 18:47, 1 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
Support per nom. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:40, 7 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add topic