Talk:Woodleigh MRT station/GA1

GA review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sammi Brie (talk · contribs) 04:06, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Copy changes

• Woodleigh was not planned to open along with the other NEL stations. The station would only — Consider joining with semicolon
• In "Station details", the second paragraph has some choppy short sentences that could use some reflow to sound better.
• "The experts in Edinburgh" — since these experts are new to the reader, I wouldn't use a definite article. "Experts in Edinburgh..." This could also perhaps be joined by semicolon with the preceding sentence.

Other notes

• Refs are archived.
• Images have alt tags and are suitably licensed. The image in the History section probably should be left-aligned; I know this isn't always the best option, but I'd rather have some balance in the layout than what's lopsided.
• Earwig reveals only quotes and common phrases in similarity.

Overall

• Just a bit of prose fine-tuning and moving that one image over and you have a GA, ZKang123. Ping me when changes have been made. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 04:20, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

  Addressed above issues. @Sammi Brie ZKang123 (talk) 09:49, 20 January 2022 (UTC)